Rituals of Retribution: From the Traditional to the Contemporary

  • Paul Redekop Conflict Resolution Studies, Menno Simons College at The University of Winnipeg

Abstract

Durkheim saw public rituals of punishment as acts of emphatic denunciation that provided a focus for the outrage and righteous indignation of the moral community. Foucault saw the public execution as an 'act of terror' inflicted on the body of the criminal, to be replaced by a "gentler" treatment of the soul of the offender as well as the body, made possible by the penal system. It will be argued first of all that public execution was abolished, not for humanitarian reasons, but because these public degradation ceremonies could no longer be counted on to induce the desired combination of indignation and awe, as audiences became more sophisticated and therefore capable of questioning the process, and even of sympathizing with the persons being executed. Secondly, it will be demonstrated that public execution has now been replaced by the contemporary revenge drama, represented by the "Dirty Harry" movies and others that enact contemporary rituals of punishment to arouse these emotions of outrage, indignation and fear, while controlling for the possibility of any alternative perspectives that would undermine these kinds of reactions.
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
REDEKOP, Paul. Rituals of Retribution: From the Traditional to the Contemporary. Interdisciplinary Justice Research, [S.l.], v. 1, may 2016. ISSN 1925-2420. Available at: <http://ijr.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/ijr/article/view/13>. Date accessed: 20 nov. 2017.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.